Skip to content

May 23, 2024

May 23, 2024

Special Seminar: Thursday, May 23, 1.05 pm Eastern Special Time

  • Speaker: Benjamin Nachman LBL DOE Laboratory
  • Title: Generative AI for the Pursuit of Fundamental Interactions
  • Abstract: Deep generative models are being developed, adapted, and deployed to a number of challenges in particle physics. In this talk, I will survey some of these topics, including surrogate modeling for slow physics-based simulations, anomaly detection to search for new particles, and simulation-based inference.
  • Presentation: GenerativeAISpring2024.pdf (open)
  • Recording of Session: VisibleScience Working Group (2024-05-23 10_03 GMT-7).mp4 (skip first 12 minutes 30 seconds)

Quoted Papers

Notes on Presentation

  • 21 people attended this excellent talk
  • The presentation started by describing fundamental physics and some places where generative AI is used
  • Initially Caloscore and the Kaggle challenge were described
  • The ata sparse and so use point clouds
  • The Benjamin described a bolder goal to describe the full process of simulation, hadronization and reconstruction. Here one has a point cloud in both input and output
  • Best to map quarks and gluons to observed particles as hadronization uncertain.
  • FHadronization and off line problems speed is not important whereas critical for CaloScore type problem.
  • This leads to Unfolding with Schrödinger Bridge and other methods. Both GANs and diffusion models are used. Normalizing Flows similar
  • Described a NIPS Data challenge for anomaly detection. FAIR Universe HiggsML Challenge
  • Slide 19 show how this can lead to improved identification of new signals which are reliable when classical methods would give a lower significance than the chassical “five sigma” usually looked for Why do physicists mention “five sigma” in their results? | CERN.
  • Slide 20 describes possible use of Differentiable simulations in hadronization problem.
  • Benjamin described recent Foundation model work
  • Gans are hardest to train but flexible so use in hadronization; also GANs faster than diffusion models
  • Normalizing Flows give you density whereas diffusion model gives score only
  • Tom Gibbs noted the related NVIDIA GTC presentation GTC_2024_HEP by Vinicius M. Mikuni, also from LBL.