Special Seminar: Thursday, May 23, 1.05 pm Eastern Special Time
Speaker: Benjamin Nachman LBL DOE Laboratory
Title: Generative AI for the Pursuit of Fundamental Interactions
Abstract: Deep generative models are being developed, adapted, and deployed to a number of challenges in particle physics. In this talk, I will survey some of these topics, including surrogate modeling for slow physics-based simulations, anomaly detection to search for new particles, and simulation-based inference.
Calorimeter Simulation Accelerating Science with Generative Adversarial Networks: An Application to 3D Particle Showers in Multi-Layer Calorimeters https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.02355
CaloScore: (Diffusion model for Calorimeter Simulation from Nachman) Comparison of Point Cloud and Image-based Models for Calorimeter Fast Simulation https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.04780
The presentation started by describing fundamental physics and some places where generative AI is used
Initially Caloscore and the Kaggle challenge were described
The ata sparse and so use point clouds
The Benjamin described a bolder goal to describe the full process of simulation, hadronization and reconstruction. Here one has a point cloud in both input and output
Best to map quarks and gluons to observed particles as hadronization uncertain.
FHadronization and off line problems speed is not important whereas critical for CaloScore type problem.
This leads to Unfolding with Schrödinger Bridge and other methods. Both GANs and diffusion models are used. Normalizing Flows similar
Described a NIPS Data challenge for anomaly detection. FAIR Universe HiggsML Challenge
Slide 19 show how this can lead to improved identification of new signals which are reliable when classical methods would give a lower significance than the chassical “five sigma” usually looked for Why do physicists mention “five sigma” in their results? | CERN.
Slide 20 describes possible use of Differentiable simulations in hadronization problem.
Benjamin described recent Foundation model work
Gans are hardest to train but flexible so use in hadronization; also GANs faster than diffusion models
Normalizing Flows give you density whereas diffusion model gives score only
Tom Gibbs noted the related NVIDIA GTC presentation GTC_2024_HEP by Vinicius M. Mikuni, also from LBL.